Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 29% better in Rust than Core i7-10700F - 263 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £214.12 vs £321.56
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £321.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74094 minutes ago
Buy for £214.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74094 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
56.760563380281695%
Multi-Core
7231
41.05956504457441%
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |