Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £217.4 vs £399.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £0.37 vs £0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 28% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-10700F - 745 vs 584 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
584
78%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£217.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £217.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Buy for £399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |