Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 705 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - £208.88 vs £482.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i9-12900KS - £1.4 vs £2.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 36% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i7-10700F - 203 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
149
73%
Value, £/FPS
£1.4/FPS
100%
Price, £
£208.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
203
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.38/FPS
58%
Price, £
£482.99
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for £482.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |