Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £208.88 vs £514.33
- Up to 55% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-14900F - £1.0 vs £2.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-10700F - 232 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
89%
Value, £/FPS
£1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£208.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £208.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
232
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.22/FPS
45%
Price, £
£514.33
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for £514.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |