Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 559 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - £214.12 vs £395.0
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-10700F - 274 vs 272 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £214.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74472 minutes ago
Buy for £395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74472 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
96.64268585131894%
Multi-Core
7231
90.84170854271358%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |