Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1995 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 55% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 1600 - 82 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £220.6 vs £346.89
- Up to 2% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-13700K - £4.16 vs £4.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
82
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.23/FPS
98%
Price, £
£346.89
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for £346.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18147 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
53
64%
Value, £/FPS
£4.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £220.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17936 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |