Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2890 days newer than Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-3470T - 125 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 20 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£399.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3698 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
565
33.711217183770884%
Multi-Core
1135
13.470211250890102%
Intel Core i5-3470T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |