Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2412 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - £29.0 vs £98.66
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-9400F - £0.23 vs £0.73 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-3470S - 135 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 6 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
128
94.81481481481482%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2532 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.73/FPS
31.506849315068497%
Price, £
£98.66
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for £98.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2533 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
604
43.83164005805516%
Multi-Core
1724
35.66404633843608%
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |