Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - £29.0 vs £101.31
- Up to 69% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-10400F - £0.15 vs £0.49 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-3470S - 205 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
30%
Price, £
£101.31
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for £101.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |