Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2517 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - £29.0 vs £108.66
- Up to 72% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i3-9100F - £0.17 vs £0.61 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Core i5-3470S - 177 vs 169 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
169
95.48022598870057%
Value, £/FPS
£0.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2414 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
177
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.61/FPS
27.868852459016395%
Price, £
£108.66
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for £108.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2415 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
604
43.95924308588064%
Multi-Core
1724
46.988280185336606%
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |