Buy on Amazon
£203
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $221
Availability
MSRP in USD: $221
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 38% better in New World than Celeron G3900 - 138 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - £25.15 vs £203.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing New World than Core i5-13400 - £0.25 vs £1.47 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel® Core™ i5-13400 Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) 20MB Cache, up to 4.6 GHz
Buy for £203 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 428 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
100
72%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£25.15
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz 2M Cache Dual-Core CPU Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 Tray
Buy for £25.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 428 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-13400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
