Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1189 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 205 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £599.99 vs £2445.47
- Up to 75% better value when playing Control than Core i5-12400 - £2.99 vs £11.93 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 24 vs 12 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, £/FPS
£11.93/FPS
25%
Price, £
£2445.47
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,445.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
201
98%
Value, £/FPS
£2.99/FPS
100%
Price, £
£599.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |