Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1173 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-9900K - 130 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £408.88 vs £2445.47
- Up to 82% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-12400 - £3.3 vs £18.81 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
130
100%
Value, £/FPS
£18.81/FPS
17%
Price, £
£2445.47
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,445.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
124
95%
Value, £/FPS
£3.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£408.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £408.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |