Buy on Amazon
£169.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7500T - 204 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 11% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7500T - £0.83 vs £0.93 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - £167.92 vs £169.99
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£169.99
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11600K (3.9 GHz / 4.9 GHz, 12M Cache)
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Intel BX80677I57500T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7500T Processor
Buy for £167.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
