Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 1134 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Celeron G4900 - 155 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 45 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
