Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 2437 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 126 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 20 vs 12 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |