Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8845HS is 3376 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 288 vs 264 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 7 8845HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
886
35.63958165728077%
Multi-Core
5378
46.08002741838745%
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
