Buy on Amazon
£132.79
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $378
Availability
MSRP in USD: $378
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Core i7-7820HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1533 days newer than Core i7-7820HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-7820HQ - 128 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820HQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HQ
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£132.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL - CLIENT CPU CORE I5-11400F 2.60GHZ SKTLGA1200 12.00MB CACHE BOXED
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i7-7820HQ
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-7820HQ |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i5-11400F or Core i7-7820HQ
Elden Ring, 1920 x 1080, Maximum
49 FPS
£18.37/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Core i5-11400F
16 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
£899.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
