Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Core i7-7820HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 840 days newer than Core i7-7820HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HQ
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-7820HQ - 248 vs 242 FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65463 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1185
86.24454148471615%
Multi-Core
3555
96.89288634505316%
Intel Core i7-7820HQ | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |