Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-6100 - 238 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - £35.24 vs £132.82
- Up to 71% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-11400F - £0.16 vs £0.56 per FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
238
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.56/FPS
28%
Price, £
£132.82
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for £132.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |