Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2750 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - £35.24 vs £120.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i3-9100F - £0.18 vs £0.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in The Outer Worlds than FX-6100 - 204 vs 194 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |