Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1358 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - £35.24 vs £80.09
- Up to 55% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-6700 - £0.24 vs £0.53 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than FX-6100 - 150 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Buy for £80.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |