Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2129 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 23% better in Rust than FX-6100 - 185 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 24 vs 6 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£409.61
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for £409.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Zambezi | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |