Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 922 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Athlon 200GE - 199 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - £86.0 vs £132.79
- Up to 27% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11400F - £0.49 vs £0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.67/FPS
73%
Price, £
£132.79
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for £132.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12642 minutes ago
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12641 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |