Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 219 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £119.95 vs £629.22
- Up to 85% better value when playing Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £0.55 vs £3.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 24 vs 12 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16341 minutes ago
Buy for £629.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |