Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - £119.95 vs £525.79
- Up to 76% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-14900F - £0.43 vs £1.82 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i5-10600KF - 289 vs 280 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16687 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
289
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.82/FPS
23%
Price, £
£525.79
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for £525.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16686 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |