Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2650 days newer than Core i3-550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-550
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 73 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-550 - 290 vs 273 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-550 - 16 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
290
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.56/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-550 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarkdale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |