Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - £69.22 vs £210.57
- Up to 66% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-10700F - £0.61 vs £1.82 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-10105F - 116 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
114
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.61/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
116
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.82/FPS
33%
Price, £
£210.57
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for £210.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |