Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - £74.35 vs £186.96
- Up to 57% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-10600K - £0.2 vs £0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-10105F - 399 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
371
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£74.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £74.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6342 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
399
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
42%
Price, £
£186.96
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for £186.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |