Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - £69.22 vs £231.86
- Up to 69% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-10700KF - £0.39 vs £1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10105F - 182 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 424 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.27/FPS
30%
Price, £
£231.86
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for £231.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 424 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |