Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - £186.96 vs £249.12
- Up to 24% better value when playing Stray than Core i7-12700F - £1.01 vs £1.33 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Core i5-10600K - 188 vs 185 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
185
98%
Value, £/FPS
£1.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£186.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £186.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12869 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
188
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.33/FPS
75%
Price, £
£249.12
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for £249.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12869 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |