Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1864 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - £5.99 vs £98.66
- Up to 93% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i5-9400F - £0.05 vs £0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 27% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G1820 - 143 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
113
79.02097902097903%
Value, £/FPS
£0.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 332 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
143
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.69/FPS
7.246376811594205%
Price, £
£98.66
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for £98.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 333 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
35.63134978229318%
Multi-Core
825
17.06661150186181%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |