Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - £5.99 vs £84.99
- Up to 93% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i3-10105 - £0.02 vs £0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 5% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G1820 - 312 vs 297 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
297
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.02/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Buy for £84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |