Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - £5.99 vs £119.95
- Up to 95% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10600KF - £0.02 vs £0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1820 - 301 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
274
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.02/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |