Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3321 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - £5.99 vs £117.71
- Up to 94% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-13100 - £0.01 vs £0.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 53 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 49% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1820 - 668 vs 448 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
448
67.06586826347305%
Value, £/FPS
£0.01/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44120 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
668
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.18/FPS
5.555555555555556%
Price, £
£117.71
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for £117.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
21.79316466932978%
Multi-Core
825
11.244377811094452%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |