Buy on Amazon
£5.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - £5.99 vs £135.18
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-11500 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 13% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G1820 - 513 vs 452 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1820 2.70 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 53 W CPU Processor LGA 1150
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75784 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i5-11500 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & select 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £135.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75784 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Core i5-11500
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
24.599198396793586%
Multi-Core
825
11.112607758620689%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
