Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1584 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
