Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v3 is 281 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 53 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G1820 - 225 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
208
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |