Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 315 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 17 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron 847 - 149 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
149
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12483 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |