Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2940 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Celeron 847 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 16 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
