Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2940 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Tanks than Celeron 847 - 540 vs 496 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 12 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
540
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£100.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £100.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |