Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1318 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron 2955U - 401 vs 362 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 12 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
401
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.45/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |