Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 669 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 15 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron 2955U - 188 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
188
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.8/FPS
100%
Price, £
£150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |