Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1691 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 20% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron 2955U - 204 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 12 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
204
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.92/FPS
100%
Price, £
£187.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £187.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
268
21.665319320937755%
Multi-Core
460
8.740262207866236%
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |