Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 266 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700G - £69.30 vs £139.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 7 5700G - £0.51 vs £0.99 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G6900 - 142 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7107 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.99/FPS
52%
Price, £
£139.99
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for £139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7107 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700G |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |