Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 21 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - £69.30 vs £70.00
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Celeron G6900 - 231 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Celeron G6900 - £0.30 vs £0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £69.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7111 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.3/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7112 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |