Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 and the cheaper Celeron G6900 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - £69.80 vs £145.00
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-12400 - £0.46 vs £0.92 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Celeron G6900 - 158 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
153
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 291 minutes ago
Buy for £145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 291 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |