Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - £69.80 vs £238.62
- Up to 65% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-12600K - £0.12 vs £0.34 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 19% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G6900 - 694 vs 583 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
583
84%
Value, £/FPS
£0.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 276 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
694
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.34/FPS
35%
Price, £
£238.62
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for £238.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 276 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |