Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - £69.30 vs £346.84
- Up to 76% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-12900K - £0.37 vs £1.56 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 18% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G6900 - 223 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
189
85%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7302 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
223
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.56/FPS
24%
Price, £
£346.84
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for £346.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7303 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |