Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-12700K - £69.30 vs £201.54
- Up to 61% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-12700K - £0.51 vs £1.32 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G6900 - 153 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
88%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7122 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
153
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.32/FPS
39%
Price, £
£201.54
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for £201.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7122 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i7-12700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |